Manufactured Serendipity
By Sam Ruby, March 13, 2002.
There are a number of people out there speculating as to why the blogging phenomenon
is occurring. Like most people, I feel that everyone else is missing
the point, so I've set out to correct this in my own way.
Non reasons 
Much of the current wave of introspection was kicked off by Dvorak's column.
He cited five reasons: Ego gratification, Antidepersonalization, Elimination of frustration, Societal need to share, and Wanna-be writers.
Like most webloggers, I see how some of these reasons may apply to other web
loggers, but clearly none of them apply to me.
Mark Kraft's response
certainly feels good: community and communication. But aren't there more
effective ways to communicate than putting a "message in a bottle"
(his analogy, not mine)? And how exactly does limiting oneself to
communication via messages in a bottle foster a community?
Dave Winer and Paul Boutin discuss
civil disobedience and exhibitionism. I've never had much of a desire to
run a webcam - much to the relief of most people reading this, I imagine.
Truth be told, I also only share what I want to share anyway. As far as
civil disobedience goes - does anybody else find it ironic that some self described
aging hippie
who pretty much is the establishment in this corner of the weblogging
world mentions this?
Jon Udell has more cerebral explanations. Transparency,
for example. Pop quiz: are you for or against transparency? Seems
like this is more a means than an end. Besides, wouldn't it be great if
everybody else were more transparent, a la the Prisoner's
Dilemma? Meanwhile, pass me the NDA...
Peter Drayton yesterday wrote a excellent article
on flow and etiquette, identifying me simultaneously as a connector, link, and
content maven. Cool. But all this still begs the question: what's in
in for me?
Weblogs as Petri dishes 
When Radio added support for RSS
titles (presumably in response to Jon's impatience?), the reluctance shows
through loud and clear for many, the discipline of coming up with a title for
each post is work that would add little value. Compare this to the
excitement a day or so later when this lead to the development of the googleItMacro.
This development was most definitely not planned in advance, but happened due to
a tight feedback loop with the users. Was this an isolated case? No.
Now look at WSDL
FM. The root cause for this development is that Dave's original webServicesTutorial
left out a number of crucial details. I dove
in. Simon noticed my work and built
upon it. I saw how all the pieces could be put together, described how the
system could
work, and Simon made it real. Then Ingo Rammer compares
this unplanned development to the planned alternatives.
No comparison, IMHO.
My WSDL
BDG got an addition due to a similar series of events. Dave Winer asks
for a WSDL for the ping service. Ari Pernick finds himself unable
to do so using only the information in part I of this document. Simon
makes a few suggestions,
and I complete
part II. The result? It
works!
I've never met Dave. I only met Simon after this all
occurred. I may never cross paths with Ari. None of this was
necessary for this ad hoc collaboration to form. In real time. And
effectively.
In fact, I developed this essay (the one you are reading) over a period of a
few days. There is no way I could have anticipated Peter Drayton's article
or the googleIt macro when I started. I merely was opportunistic when the
possibility of the unknowing ad hoc collaboration presented itself.
Manufactured Serendipity
One day I note that I see snow
outside the window. Because
of this, I have dinner with Miguel de Icaza.
Google notices
that there is a high correlation between the content of my weblog and this
conference. So I decide
to go.
Mark Pilgrim uses the term y'all.
Makes me curious about where he lives
and where he is from.
It turns out I grew up 2.5 hours south east of there and now we live 10 or so
miles apart. He even suggests that we get
together some time. I'd like that.
Jon Udell labels this phenomenon, manufactured
serendipity. Serendipity
is all about making fortunate discoveries by accident. You can't automate
accidental discoveries, but you can manufacture the conditions in which such
events are more likely to occur. Dick Hardt did this by picking the two of
us, among others, for ActiveState's Technical
Advisory Board. A number of SOAPBuilders got
together at IONA for pretty much the same reason. Conferences are also
a great place for doing this.
So to now are weblogs.
Let it flow, let it flow, let it flow 
I started this essay making fun of the other reasons people have given, but
there certainly is an element of truth in each. As a web surfer, I
frequent sites that change more often than static sites. Particularly ones
written by people with similar interests to mine, and are a both provocative and
yet have some element of a balanced perspective (or at least a bias that can be
clearly recognized and discounted). The most effective way I have found to
identify such sites is to set up my own weblog and watching who stops by.
The key ingredient in all of this is flow. So like the early American
settlers, the thing to do is to set up shop near a river and pick up stray
interesting bits as they float by. By spidering back with referrer
logs, daypop,
and google;
eddies can form where
the true serendipity generation occurs.
The Tipping
Blog explores a state change that occurs when a idea takes on a life of its
own. At that point, the Petri dish gets transformed into a particle
accelerator, and new ideas are created by smashing together previously unrelated
ideas at a high velocity. Many of the ideas created have a short half
life. Others are more enduring - this is where the WSDL FMs and GoogleIt
macros are formed.
Conclusion 
So why do I blog? Because it works. It finds worthwhile things
for me to read. It helps me refine and focus my thoughts and be more
productive too. And most of all, creates the opportunity to interact with
more interesting people. That's what's in it for me.
|
|
© Copyright
2002
Sam Ruby
.
Last update:
9/1/2002; 6:53:31 PM
.
This theme is based on the SoundWaves
(blue) Manila theme. |
|