intertwingly

WSREST2010: @samruby’s #wsrest2010 keynote talk “Willful Violations” slides available at [link]...

I have the feeling you took my quote on Google Reader way out of context. To be clear, I had little to nothing to do with the HTML5 to Atom mapping. Also, with unique IDs being ignored I was referring to the global concept behind Atom IDs, not whether they add uniqueness to individual entries. You then pointed out I misunderstood the question.

そういやWS-RESTやってたのか／もしかしてSamとLeonardって直接会ったことなかったのかもｗ／最後のページの名言? “Experts” are sometimes wrong...

For some reason, I imagined you giving this talk wearing a black leather jacket and shades.

Regardless of that, I hope that you mentioned that we’re working on fixing these mismatches between HTML5 and HTTP in HTTPbis.

Your talk made me sad.

Is there anybody left out there who care about correctness of documents just for the sake of saving other people’s time?

Don’t people realise that every time you produce non-conforming output you are wasting somebody’s life? Somebody will have to spend their time to adapt their application to your sloppiness (probably blaming and cursing you).

For a “legacy” page, the Google’s front page continues to get a lot of attention.  This week, it got a fresh look and feel.  Most of the same validation errors still remain.

Part of my continuing series of reflections on the REST workshop at WWW 2010... Sam Ruby’s keynote began with a call for technologists to back off the extreme positions often taken in technical arguments (likely because he’s knee deep in......