It’s just data

Wordpress Vigilance and Plans

First, behold the benefits of automated testing: TRAC 5180.  :-)

Update: fixed in revision 6243 (history)

Goals I’d like to set for myself for the next release of Wordpress are twofold: get the APE messages to 0 errors and 0 warnings; and to cleanup the code so that Atom entries are produced in exactly one place and consumed in exactly one place.  (Pete Lacey has indicated that he shares the latter goal and has some additional goals).

The first warning is re: auth and as it is my server, I can certainly configure it for tls/ssl, and will do so.

I’d like to know who the best person (or persons) on the WordPress team to chat with w.r.t. how best to retain foreign markup.  This could be an additional database column, or it could be a special form of an attachment, and I would be open to any other idea.

A combination of the code cleanup and handing foreign markup would mean that people who use an APP tool could post extension elements that actually appear in their feed.  Does anybody know of any actual use cases for such a function?

A baby step towards converging the wp-app and feed-atom code can be found in this patch.  This change (or something like it) could be a first step towards supporting grammars like SVG in WordPress.


Custom Fields?

Posted by Sam Ruby at

Changeset 6229 breaks the atom feed
Support Foreign Markup in APP requests
Support “minor edits” in Atom

Posted by Sam Ruby at

Latest links: AtomPub news round-up edition

I’ve been in crunch-mode working on a new project, but I’ve been trying to keep an eye on what’s going on the world of Atom Publishing Protocol or AtomPub as the cool kids call it . Here’s a wrap-up of some of the AtomPub news I’ve picked up on the...

Excerpt from Blogging Roller at

I think Custom Fields are a good match for preserving foreign markup in AtomPub. Since AtomPub is becoming an integral and important part of WordPress, one might argue that foreign markup deserves its own database column, but if that’s too much fuzz to add, a Custom Field is possibly an implementation complexity sweet-spot.

Posted by Asbjørn Ulsberg at

Add your comment