Bounces
If my experience is anywhere near representative, it seems like the future of SPAM on the Internet is to be sent purportedly from somebody that doesn’t exist, and to somebody that doesn’t exist.
:0: * ^FROM_MAILER * ! ^TO_rubys@ * ! ^List-Id | /home/rubys/bin/logspam
Update: added exclusion for emails containing List-Id
as I was no longer seeing emails from the
feedvalidator-users mailing list.
From the manpage:
‘^FROM_MAILER’ ... (a stripped down version of ‘^FROM_DAEMON’), which should catch mails coming from most mailer-daemons.
This rule does seem to be letting though mailing list traffic. FROM_DAEMON won’t. Trust me on this, as atom-protocol went eerily silent for me for a few hours until I figured this out. ;-)
Posted by Sam Ruby atHormel Foods on SPAM and the Internet:
If the term is to be used, it should be used in all lower-case letters to distinguish it from our trademark SPAM, which should be used with all uppercase letters.
;-)
Posted by Lenny atSpam bounces
Sam Ruby: Bounces: If my experience is anywhere near representative, it seems like the future of SPAM on the Internet is to be sent purportedly from somebody that doesn’t exist, and to somebody that doesn’t exist. I’ve had the same experience. Since...Excerpt from Keith's Weblog at
I get many, many of these sorts of messages myself. However, I also get BCC’d messages from time to time, and messages sent to distribution lists. Does the procmail recipe account for those sorts of legitimate messages at the same time it’s throwing out everything not addressed to you?
-Mike
Posted by Mike West at