Based on the recent discussions on verbs, it seems appropriate
to make a more clear distinction between verbs as message exchange
patterns (necessary, but as a rule, the fewer the better), versus
verbs as imperatives (generally to be avoided).
As this distinction is subtle, I decided to sneak up on the
topic.
Sam Ruby writes, "The number of frequencies emanated, when expressed in decimal notation, was estimated to be a 1 followed by some 100 zeros. For this reason, some called this point Google, but this later turned out to be a misnomer." While its an excellent essay overall, I feel like I've gotten only halfway there. I just wish there was a "case study," that would solidify this more. Ie, the traditional way of implementing this would be Xyz but now its all a matter of Abc. My current understanding of the essay is: 1) Design interfaces that reflect data, don't design interfaces that re-structure data. 2) (Gently) mock REST Am I off base? :)...
[more]
Trackback from Sterling Hughes
at
Topology
Sam Ruby nudges us gently with his new essay, Topology....
It is hilarious to me that a number of people have their knickers in a twist because SOAP 1.1 sends queries via POST (as does http://www.aa.com for that matter), but don't seem bothered by FTP which has long running stateful session oriented conversations...
Sam Ruby nudges us gently with his new essay, Topology: "The essay explores, in a rather whimsical way, the fundamental message exchange patterns that make up web like interactions." [Matt Croydon::postneo]...