Snell: Why can't an item contain both a category and a
dc:subject? Sure, it's redundant but it shouldn't be illegal.
On Mark's and my todo list is to more precisely distinguish
between things that are outright illegal and things that are merely
While such duplication is not clearly illegal, there are enough
questions on the precedence rules between items that have
overlapping semantics (examples:
Appnel) that I would definitely classify this as a bad
If I weren't currently eyelid-deep in a Death March Spiral project from hell, I might have a few minutes to work on this. Is IBM hiring yet?
Personally, I don't see how there should be a precedence issue here. dc:subject and description are two different properties defined in two different namespaces. While they may have overlapping purposes,...