It’s just data

creativeCommons RSS validation

I just committed code which validates the new creativeCommons rss module.  What this entails is the following:

This continues the effort to codify RSS Best Practices.  The first bullet above is the same concern as the one expressed on <a> and <img> tags previously.  The second is to avoid confusion.  The third is because while the following are both valid RSS 2.0, there is no precidence rule used to arbitrate between them should they differ:

<cc:license rdf:resource = "http://www.creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/1.0" />

<creativeCommons:license> http://www.creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/1.0 </creativeCommons>


When Idealism trips, and flounders

Pessimistics see the world from its dark side -- always the glass half empty. They never see that the world can be made better, that problems can be solved. They are not constructive, though they aren't destructive. Idealists, on ... [more]

Trackback from Burningbird

at

I'm not at all keen on the Creative Commons encouraged practise of embedding RDF in a comment on an HTML page, for the same reason I dislike TrackBack doing it: When an XML processor parses an XHTML document there is no garauntee that the processor will have access to the comments. I've written this complaint up (and suggested an alternative) on my blog.

Posted by Simon Willison at

Add your comment