I hope this isn't too late. Perhaps not, the spec isn't listed as 1.0 yet. In any case, I feel really bad about not reviewing RSD before, expecially given that the RFC links to not one but three of my essays. I have three comments, which I will give in decreasing order of importance:
1) In the examples, there is an "rsd" namespace which is defined but never used. In order to use it, one would have to prefix each element with "rsd:". A simpler fix is to simply define this as the default namespace for the document, by dropping the ":rsd" entirely from the declaration. As it stands, I would say that the examples don't comply with the spec.
2) rpcLink presumes, well, RPC. With protocols like the RESTLog Interface, there is not a single URL, but rather a set of them. Yes, there is a base URL and one could munge it into this slot, but it really doesn't fit, and furthermore calling the slot RPC unnecessary provokes the more radical RESTians out there.
3) I would prefer to see a simple URL instead of a centrally managed list of "well known names". That's not to say that there can't be a list of known URLs. This is for two reasons: (1) to decentralize the maintenance, and (2) to provide more value by providing a direct link to the documentation of the protocol supported.
Winpalace88 adalah tempat terbaik untuk mencari arena sabung ayam yang sudah sangat populer sejak dahulu kala. Bekerja sama dengan agen sabung ayam terkemuka di Indonesia, yaitu S128 dan SV388, Winpalace88 menyediakan arena sabung ayam secara online dengan menggunakan deposit pulsa.
Link Alternatif Sabung Ayam Winpalace88
daftar sv388
daftar red tiger slot
daftar sv388
daftar casino sv388
daftar s128 indonesia
daftar s128 online
deposit s128 sabung ayam via pulsa
daftar mma s128
daftar s128
agen terbaik s128
agen sabung ayam online
situs daftar slot red tiger
cara daftar slot sv388
situs daftar slot spade gaming